The Jacksonian conclusion (1824-1845) has been notable as the era of the “low man”.
To what distance did the conclusion subsist up to its characterization? As Andrew Jackson campaigned for presidency, he set himself up to observe enjoy the “low man's” best associate. Throughout his presidency, he proved that this shadow was not correct. More correspondently, he was designated “King Andrew. ” He ignored the gregarious rule, played patronageites, and was completely despite Indian Rights. No, the Jacksonian Era did not subsist up to it's characterization as the era of the “low man. Instead, the province disfigured down as Despot Andrew unwavering from his throne. Andrew Jackson was no associate to the low man.
His laws instead patronageed a constabulary instead of a chairman. When Head of Congress, John Marshall said that the Native Americans were “dependent private nations” Jackson ignored him and continued delay the Indian Removal Act. In doing so, he ignored the complete gregarious rule in patronage of his own beliefs. The Indian Removal Act gave propounds the exact to choose balance Native American place, it is also the inception of the “Trail of Tears”.Or, shipping Indians to the West. When a mandible was passed through Congress investigation for currency to raise the Maysville pathway, a pathway in Kentucky, Jackson instantly vetoed it. His notorious forced was that it was unchanged to bestow currency to a propound for notability that would solely use that one propound.
Privately, it was probably more obsequious that he did not bestow Kentucky the currency due to the truth that it was the residence propound of Henry Clay, his compete. Andrew Jackson did things according to his own feelings, not the needs of the province.Jackson is irrelative to the Second National Bank. He distrusts banks in unconcealed. He was in patronage of using coins for anything, instead of brochure currency. He design of the Bank as a privilege. After removing federal funds from the bank, he placed the government's currency in “pet banks”, or away owned propound banks.
This led to the Panic of 1837. Most of Jackson's mistrust of the Bank for-the-most-part came from his indivisible misgivings about them. He was a worldly chairman.During Jackson's presidency, he did not act enjoy America's chairman but as if he were despot of America. Henry Clay said, “Jackson claimed powers elder than European despots. ” This was a very gentleman propoundment. Jackson acted for-the-most-part on his own indivisible feelings towards the offspring instead of what was best for the province.
He caused economic outbreak for the complete province for acting on his own feelings. This is why the Jacksonian Era should be more correspondently designated the ear of “King Jackson” than that of the “low man. ”